Is Today’s Court the Most Conservative in Sixty Years? Challenges and Opportunities in Measuring Judicial Preferences
نویسنده
چکیده
Court scholars have a voracious appetite for Supreme Court preference measures. Several papers question whether widely-used Martin and Quinn scores provide valid intertemporal measures, calling into question virtually an entire generation of quantitative research on the Court. This paper discusses the challenges of inter-temporal preference estimation and revises, updates and extends Bailey and Maltzman (2011) to present Supreme Court preference estimates that are more defensibly comparable across time and institutions.
منابع مشابه
Challenges for Using other Person's Commercial Card in the Tax Law System of Iran (With an Attitude to Legislative and Executive Policies)
Given the macroeconomic policies of reducing dependence on oil revenues (as the most important sources of government revenue) and increasing tax revenues, a decisive response to the phenomenon of tax evasion has become the most important economic and political goals of the government. The use of the other person's commercial card as one of the tax evasion techniques is one of the tax crimes tha...
متن کاملEvolution of the European Court of Human Rights encountering with challenges of the right to life: A Case Study of Fundamental Abortion and Mortality Votes
The right to life is one of the fundamental human rights that has been recognized and guaranteed in all religious texts and in many international documents, including the European Convention on Human Rights. Nevertheless, at the same time as the ease of meaning, its conceptual difficulty has been challenged by various lawyers. This Include the death penalty, suicide, Otanazi, abortion as the mo...
متن کاملThe Role of Judicial Procedure Courts in the Development of Iranian Administrative Law
Today, in leading administrative law systems, the judicial process along with the law is the most important source of legal rules, and the law alone can not feed the legal system. Although in the administrative law system of Iran, the use of judicial procedure has often been considered as a source and interpretation of the law and not as the main source, but the role of administrative courts, ...
متن کاملCompetent Authorities to Handle Complaints about Incorrect Tax Assessment and Collection with an Ethical Approach in Iran
Background: Retrial is an additional combination of the words "retrial" and "trial". Trial is a means of justice and trial, like others, is in the introduction of error and error if there is a verdict that is accompanied by error as a result of the trial. Which must be reconsidered. In the relations between taxpayers and the tax system, a dispute is possible, which can be due to factors such as...
متن کاملThe Least Activist Supreme Court in History? the Roberts Court and the Exercise of Judicial Review
Not too many years ago, scholars could reasonably speak of the U.S. Supreme Court as being among the most activist in American history. Both empirical and normative scholarship was driven by the sense of a Court that was aggressive in the assertion of its own supremacy and active in the exercise of the power of judicial review. The Court under Chief Justice John Roberts cannot be viewed in the ...
متن کامل